Where fiber is being built in Michigan
As of Dec 31, 2025, FCC filings show fiber at 35.3% of Michigan's 5.1 million homes, and the number of fiber homes grew 9.9% from June 30, 2025.
Fiber was filed in 512 of 595 Michigan cities and towns with 250 or more homes. In 232 of them it reached more than half of homes, and in the typical one it reached 43.3%.
Nationally, fiber was filed at 55.8% of homes. FCC Broadband Data Collection, residential units, 25/3 Mbps or faster. Filed by the providers themselves. How this is computed
Michigan counties
Pick a county for its full set of measures, grants and providers. Shares are of residential units, FCC filing as of Dec 31, 2025; growth is from June 30, 2025.
| County | Homes | Fiber share | Cable, no fiber | Fiber home growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcona County | 11,140 | 7.7% | at least 40.5% | -0.7% |
| Alger County | 7,068 | 66.1% | at least 6.8% | -1.6% |
| Allegan County | 60,791 | 59% | at least 31.4% | +34.7% |
| Alpena County | 17,771 | 23.8% | at least 59.2% | +34.7% |
| Antrim County | 19,958 | 45.6% | at least 40.7% | +16.8% |
| Arenac County | 11,263 | 7% | at least 51.8% | +6.5% |
| Baraga County | 5,686 | 68.4% | at least 4.5% | +3.8% |
| Barry County | 29,845 | 23.8% | at least 38.2% | +3.7% |
| Bay County | 52,924 | 2.8% | at least 83.2% | +233.6% |
| Benzie County | 13,596 | 37% | at least 49.5% | +27.5% |
| Berrien County | 86,671 | 37.6% | at least 57% | +9.1% |
| Branch County | 24,327 | 53.5% | at least 27.3% | +60.7% |
| Calhoun County | 65,225 | 34.6% | at least 39.9% | +31% |
| Cass County | 28,791 | 74% | at least 23.4% | -3.3% |
| Charlevoix County | 20,095 | 42.3% | at least 45.7% | +2.4% |
| Cheboygan County | 19,844 | 51.7% | at least 38.3% | -3.1% |
| Chippewa County | 22,915 | 21.5% | at least 44.3% | +32.7% |
| Clare County | 24,347 | 6.5% | at least 58.6% | -5.6% |
| Clinton County | 36,242 | 55.2% | at least 29.3% | +26.2% |
| Crawford County | 11,520 | 46.1% | at least 30.9% | -1.9% |
| Delta County | 21,419 | 56.7% | at least 32.4% | +24.1% |
| Dickinson County | 15,900 | 29.2% | at least 50.8% | +17.3% |
| Eaton County | 52,354 | 40.3% | at least 46.5% | -2.1% |
| Emmet County | 25,484 | 37.6% | at least 49.4% | +1.4% |
| Genesee County | 199,245 | 12% | at least 85.1% | +51.3% |
| Gladwin County | 18,979 | 1.2% | at least 64.8% | +0.1 points (small June base) |
| Gogebic County | 11,709 | 17.7% | at least 59.9% | +118.2% |
| Grand Traverse County | 52,876 | 14.4% | at least 73.2% | +7.7% |
| Gratiot County | 19,006 | 51.8% | at least 16.2% | -8.2% |
| Hillsdale County | 24,000 | 20.3% | at least 39.4% | +12% |
| Houghton County | 21,569 | 21.2% | at least 55.7% | +1.2% |
| Huron County | 24,704 | 45.5% | at least 41.8% | +15% |
| Ingham County | 136,753 | 63% | at least 29.2% | +1.5% |
| Ionia County | 28,171 | 41.1% | at least 34.5% | +13.4% |
| Iosco County | 22,224 | 5.1% | at least 68.9% | +5.1 points (small June base) |
| Iron County | 10,470 | 24.8% | at least 27.9% | +137.8% |
| Isabella County | 31,964 | 72.1% | at least 14.2% | -1.7% |
| Jackson County | 75,294 | 24.8% | at least 55.7% | +38.4% |
| Kalamazoo County | 125,222 | 48.8% | at least 46.7% | +7.7% |
| Kalkaska County | 12,855 | 55.4% | at least 29.2% | +316.1% |
| Kent County | 295,931 | 47.3% | at least 47.7% | +3.2% |
| Keweenaw County | 2,432 | none filed | at least 41.2% | no change (small June base) |
| Lake County | 14,441 | 44.6% | at least 10.1% | +23% |
| Lapeer County | 41,792 | 7.9% | at least 58% | +40.7% |
| Leelanau County | 17,875 | 48.1% | at least 43.2% | -3.5% |
| Lenawee County | 48,004 | 67.8% | at least 24.5% | +0.7% |
| Livingston County | 87,774 | 31.7% | at least 62% | +14.6% |
| Luce County | 4,530 | 83.6% | at least 3% | +12.2% |
| Mackinac County | 12,586 | 54.6% | at least 20.6% | +8.8% |
| Macomb County | 399,660 | 32% | at least 67.3% | +1.5% |
| Manistee County | 17,445 | 18.5% | at least 49.8% | +3.5% |
| Marquette County | 37,526 | 11.3% | at least 71.1% | +256.5% |
| Mason County | 20,044 | 27.2% | at least 36.5% | +28.3% |
| Mecosta County | 23,828 | 50.4% | at least 32.1% | -7.4% |
| Menominee County | 14,989 | 42.2% | at least 35.9% | +7.4% |
| Midland County | 40,103 | 20.4% | at least 65.6% | +345.1% |
| Missaukee County | 9,645 | 61.9% | at least 10.4% | +47.9% |
| Monroe County | 72,183 | 21.5% | at least 67.6% | +13.5% |
| Montcalm County | 32,202 | 59.2% | at least 23.5% | -1.6% |
| Montmorency County | 9,936 | 32.5% | at least 30.1% | +1.3% |
| Muskegon County | 83,442 | 56.5% | at least 37.7% | +2.9% |
| Newaygo County | 27,370 | 38.6% | at least 36.8% | +3.8% |
| Oakland County | 606,091 | 33.9% | at least 64.8% | +6.8% |
| Oceana County | 17,667 | 68% | at least 14.5% | +4.9% |
| Ogemaw County | 16,962 | 12.7% | at least 50.5% | -12.5% |
| Ontonagon County | 5,990 | 54.1% | at least 22% | +1% |
| Osceola County | 14,462 | 19.7% | at least 9.1% | +29% |
| Oscoda County | 8,467 | 45.3% | at least 21.5% | -9.3% |
| Otsego County | 17,126 | 55.2% | at least 35.7% | +1.2% |
| Ottawa County | 130,094 | 40.9% | at least 53% | +9.1% |
| Presque Isle County | 11,446 | 82.9% | at least 5.1% | +4.3% |
| Roscommon County | 25,242 | 6% | at least 85.5% | +11% |
| Saginaw County | 94,916 | 14.4% | at least 75% | +48.2% |
| Sanilac County | 26,446 | 63.6% | at least 17.7% | -0.4% |
| Schoolcraft County | 6,764 | 56.6% | at least 36.7% | +35.2% |
| Shiawassee County | 34,382 | 50% | at least 28.2% | +2.8% |
| St. Clair County | 80,046 | 21.7% | at least 67% | +68.9% |
| St. Joseph County | 31,266 | 67.9% | at least 24% | +1.2% |
| Tuscola County | 27,251 | 47.8% | at least 28.3% | -1.4% |
| Van Buren County | 42,087 | 68.6% | at least 26.3% | +8.2% |
| Washtenaw County | 174,557 | 33% | at least 61.9% | +7.1% |
| Wayne County | 857,832 | 29.8% | at least 69.5% | +13.3% |
| Wexford County | 18,842 | 29% | at least 49.8% | -0.1% |
The 30 largest places in Michigan
By number of homes. Search above for any of the other 715 cities and towns.
| City or town | Homes | Fiber share | Cable, no fiber | Fiber home growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detroit | 329,166 | 22.4% | at least 76.7% | +14.1% |
| Grand Rapids | 81,202 | 67.2% | at least 32.6% | +4.1% |
| Warren | 63,207 | 40.3% | at least 59.3% | +0.9% |
| Lansing | 54,561 | 73.6% | at least 24.1% | +1% |
| Sterling Heights | 54,068 | 10.8% | at least 88.9% | +17.5% |
| Ann Arbor | 51,471 | 32.7% | at least 62% | +5.7% |
| Flint | 46,634 | 1.4% | at least 98.3% | +1.4 points (small June base) |
| Livonia | 45,394 | 47.9% | at least 49.5% | +12.1% |
| Troy | 42,164 | 15.9% | at least 84% | +13.5% |
| Farmington Hills | 40,561 | 42.5% | at least 54.1% | +5.7% |
| Dearborn | 39,818 | 34.6% | at least 65.2% | +6% |
| Southfield | 38,526 | 49.8% | at least 50.2% | +1.2% |
| Westland | 38,299 | 35.4% | at least 64.6% | +45.7% |
| Rochester Hills | 38,121 | 14% | at least 86% | +0.6% |
| Wyoming | 32,657 | 70.6% | at least 28.9% | +8% |
| Kalamazoo | 32,533 | 58.8% | at least 39.8% | +5.5% |
| Royal Oak | 31,348 | 67.9% | at least 32.1% | +1.3% |
| Novi | 30,968 | 30.2% | at least 65.4% | +4.3% |
| St. Clair Shores | 28,192 | 86% | at least 13.9% | -0.3% |
| Taylor | 26,246 | 14.5% | at least 85.4% | +18.7% |
| Dearborn Heights | 25,550 | 55.4% | at least 44.6% | +10.7% |
| Pontiac | 25,353 | 22.1% | at least 77.4% | +2.6% |
| Kentwood | 24,196 | 55.2% | at least 44.6% | -4.9% |
| Portage | 23,639 | 57.8% | at least 40.5% | +3.4% |
| Battle Creek | 23,127 | 47.8% | at least 51.3% | +60.7% |
| Saginaw | 21,514 | 0.9% | at least 93.6% | +0.3 points (small June base) |
| Roseville | 20,960 | 82.1% | at least 17.9% | +0.1% |
| Midland | 20,778 | 30.3% | at least 60.4% | +1984.8% |
| Muskegon | 17,027 | 69.8% | at least 29.5% | -1.4% |
| East Lansing | 16,215 | 55.9% | at least 40.2% | -0.5% |
The data
Every number on this page traces to one cell in the download. Source: FCC Broadband Data Collection, Fixed Broadband Summary by Geography, filings as of June 30, 2025 and Dec 31, 2025. Census figures: ACS 5-year estimates, 2020 to 2024. Grants: FCC Broadband Funding Map and the state broadband office.
Found a market? Talk to a recruiter.
Leave your name and number and a recruiter calls you back. Bring the agency checklist to the call and ask every question on it.
Figures come from provider filings with the FCC, which providers report themselves and which can be challenged. Nothing on this page is a promise of territory, earnings or service at any address.